The 'Link' Ploy

Sequels are said to almost always be inferior to the originals. A look at Disney films of the 90's (for want of a more adult case study) is proof. The Lion King we love, but The Lion King II: Simba's Pride? Pocahontas is a classic, but Pocahantas II: Journey to a New World? No thanks. In fact I didn't even know the latter existed until I stumbled across it a few months ago while looking for something -- anything -- with which to entertain my two nephews.

This post is following the pattern of a Simpsons episode, because my point has nothing to do with sequels, but rather spin-offs. I don't know the popular concensus with regards spin-offs -- though I do know that Joey was tragic, as was That 80's show -- but I imagine it's something similar. Which eventually takes me to the point. Those of you in the know are perhaps aware that this mothership of a blog sent a reasonably sized ship -- a daughtership, if you will -- to hover over the footballing world. Lean Not has had a spin off since the end of August, which concentrates solely on matters pertaining to a small, spherical object being kicked around by flimsy, overpaid objects. I'm sort of pleased to say it's actually doing better than the original. Much, much better in fact, if the hits counters at the bottom of each blog are to believed (perhaps a big 'if', but still).

This indicates to me a few things:

- I know more about football than I do Christianity. As a Christian, and not a footballer, I should probably work on that.

- Apart from about three people, all the other people I know who are aware of my blogging haven't really got the slightest interest in football. Where did all this interest in Football Beauty come from? I find it hard to believe that people just stumble across it.

- Football is a more popular topic than Theology. Who knew?

I can account for some of the discrpeancy between the two blogs by looking at the output of each. Football Beauty gets updated a lot more regularly, and so it's only natural that the more one puts into something there more one gets out of it. I intend to rectify the situation however. Lean Not will come out from under the shadow of its wildly popular spin-off, the Frasier to its Cheers. The impending Summer almost demands it. I intend to get the oringinal back to the dizzy heights of 10 hits a day, by whatever means necessary. One way is to simply put a link up for it on my football blog and hope that brings in the football public. Another way is to start producing a higher quality of output that engages the reader and encourages them to think about that which transcends even football, and thus gets them to spread the word.

I think I'll go with the 'link' ploy for now...

A Community Project

The first step towards formulating my best man's speech has finally been taken. It involved typing "tips for best man speech" into google and perusing a few pertinent websites. The next step is Wikipedia, after which I'll have pretty much exhausted by research ideas. I did get one helpful tip from my initial google search, which is why I'm here writing about the speech in the first place. The tip is that the speech should be a community project, with the best man feeding on the input of those who know the subjects in question - in this case, my brother or his bride-to-be.

So with that, I am opening the floor to those who either have an anecdote or observance that can be incorporated into my speech. Or perhaps you just know more about speeches than I do and can give me some generally helpful tips. If these sound like the words of a desperate man bereft of ideas, then make no mistake about it - they are. In six weeks I will be expected to be funny/intelligible in front of a couple of hundred people, many of whom will probably not know who I am (and I include relatives in that).

Your support won't be so much beneficial as it will be necessary, so please, donate generously either by leaving a comment, an email, a text, or whatever. And be as disparaging as you like. The purpose of my speech is to make the bride seriously question her decision to marry my brother*.

* I'm kidding.

Perilous Exercise

I attempted press-ups today -- and I stress the word attempted -- for what was possibly the first time this millennium. It felt that long anyway. I'm not exactly sure why I felt the urge to get down on the ground and lift my less-than-considerable body weight off the ground with my less-than considerable arms. Perhaps I merely wanted to see if my arm "muscles" still work (incidentally, they don't, and if truth be told they never really did); perhaps I was giving into a desperate plea from a long-neglected part of me that is dying to be set loose - you know, that crazy part of you that wants to engage in physical discipline. It's in there somewhere, but thus far I've tamed it quite admirably.

But whatever the reason, I did it. I got on the ground and did some press-ups. 8 of them to be more accurate. Why a strange number like 8? Well, because I would have died if I did one more. If arms could talk then mine would have gone from berating me for my idiocy to begging me to stop, and finally to loud cries of utter despair, not unlike this one; and that would just have been after press-up number one. But like a man who just doesn't know when to stop, who doesn't know the meaning of the word 'quit', who won't take 'no' for an answer, I struggled on and did a whopping seven more of those perilous exercises until I came to within an inch of my life. Then I quit.

The message is clear. My arms don't like this. Though they may be subordinate to my will, the pain they can cause me is quite persuasive. Their voice echoes in my aching muscles. But I must press on with my press-ups. I have done 8; perhaps someday I will scale the heights of 10. Who knows? In time I may have things coming out of my shoulders that actually resemble a pair of adult male arms.

Crap

Here is the wonderful opening to a chapter in 'Echoes of Scripture...' which completely caught me off-guard:

'In a burst of retrospective candor, Paul tells the Philippians that he has now come to regard his whole prior religious orientation as "crap."'

Given how elegant the language of the book is -- the phrase 'hermeneutical jujitsu' is used seamlessly for example -- I think it's funny to find the word "crap" just thrown into the mix willy nilly. Granted Hays is in fact quoting Scripture with this odd choice of word. Skybala is the Greek term which is used in the Bible only in Philippians 3:8, where Paul writes regarding his former religious practices that he does

"...count them as dung/crap/rubbish, that I may win Christ."

Who knew the Bible could be so edgy and hip, eh?

Law and Gospel

'The witness of the Law and the Prophets to the righteousness of God is not merely, as Christians have sometimes strangely supposed, a witness concerning a severe retributive justice; it is a witness concerning God's gracious saving power, as Psalm 143 demonstrates.'

As I read Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul by Richard B. Hays I am continually beaten over head with this one truth: I don't have a clue how to read and interpret the Old Testament. Up until recently I wasn't too concerned with this. The Old Testament is, well, old, and large chunks of it don't apply anymore. I don't have to have bulls and goats sacrificed on my behalf, nor am I forbidden from eating my favourite of the meats - pig meat.

And yet as obvious as this sounds, the Old Testament was the only Bible the apostle Paul and all of the other Jewish Christians of his time knew. They had "the Scriptures" (what we call "the Old Testament"), and that was it. The Law, the Prophets and the Writings were Paul's bread and butter. He didn't have the Book of Hebrews to chew on, nor could he open up his Bible and read Romans. I mean he wrote Romans! And what's more, he didn't even write it thinking he was writing Scripture. Paul wasn't looking to render the Scriptures as he knew them obsolete by writing a "New Testament". Paul was writing a letter to the church in Rome in effect saying "This is what the gospel of God as found in the Scriptures is about. This is its fulfilment." That is why he could say in Romans 3:21,

"But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it..."

This sounds rather paradoxical, but what Paul is saying is that the Scriptures are like a signpost. You don't arrive at the signpost and think "I'm here. I've arrived." The signpost and the destination are not one and the same. They are necessarily "apart". However, they are by no means unrelated, and yet as Hays rightly points out, we as Christians draw lines between the signpost (the Law and the Prophets) and the fulfilment/destination (the righteousness of God found in Christ) and force people to pick sides. In our caricature, the Law and the Prophets bear witness to a capricious God who is fond of punishing people who disobey Him, but the New Testament? Well, God had a change of heart, and lets just be thankful for that.

For Paul, such a reading and interpretation of the beloved Scriptures he grew up on would have deeply offended him. His gospel was not plucked out of thin air. It was founded on 2,000 years of salvation history. It reverberated with echoes of the Old Testament, from the story of Abraham, to the prophetic writings of Habbakuk to the lyrics of the Psalms. All of these witnessed to the righteousness of God, which has demonstrated itself in Christ and is credited to us through faith in Christ. This is why Hays can say that Paul's gospel "does not annihilate the Law but establishes it".

There is much more to be said on this, and much much more to be mulled over from Hays' excellent book. To close this particular musing out, here is the Psalm which Hays says is echoed in much of Romans 3:

¹Hear my prayer, O LORD;
give ear to my pleas for mercy!
In your faithfulness answer me, in your righteousness!
² Enter not into judgment with your servant,
for no one living is righteous before you.

³For the enemy has pursued my soul;
he has crushed my life to the ground;
he has made me sit in darkness like those long dead.
⁴Therefore my spirit faints within me;
my heart within me is appalled.

⁵ I remember the days of old;
I meditate on all that you have done;
I ponder the work of your hands.
⁶ I stretch out my hands to you;
my soul thirsts for you like a parched land.
Selah

⁷ Answer me quickly, O LORD!
My spirit fails!
Hide not your face from me,
lest I be like those who go down to the pit.
⁸ Let me hear in the morning of your steadfast love,
for in you I trust.
Make me know the way I should go,
for to you I lift up my soul.

⁹ Deliver me from my enemies, O LORD!
I have fled to you for refuge!
¹⁰ Teach me to do your will,
for you are my God!
Let your good Spirit lead me
on level ground!

¹¹ For your name’s sake, O LORD, preserve my life!
In your righteousness bring my soul out of trouble!
¹²And in your steadfast love you will cut off my enemies,
and you will destroy all the adversaries of my soul,
for I am your servant.

God in Christ

"God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself..." - 2 Corinthians 5:19

This is perhaps one of the most significant verses in all of Scripture. This is how Jesus viewed the historical event of His crucifixion, and it's how His followers viewed it shortly after (give or take three days). John Stott has this to say about God in Christ:

"...in order to save us in such a way as to satisfy Himself, God through Christ substituted Himself for us. Divine love triumphed over divine wrath by divine self-sacrifice. The cross was an act simultaneously of punishment and amnesty, severity and grace, justice and mercy."

Karl Barth says it more succinctly:

"The passion of Jesus Christ is the judgment of God, in which the Judge Himself was the judged"

A friend of Dr Autry phrases it like this: The Judge took the judgment on Himself.

If the resurrection is the news that many of us hope is true, the cross is the news that many of us wish to be untrue. Paul calls it a "stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Greeks". For those today looking for a reason to reject Christianity, here it is: God on a cross. The cross of Christ can antagonizes us, or it can reveal the truest love mankind has ever experienced. The paradox and the beauty is when it does both; when it is seen that "severity and grace" meet at the cross.

The Why

I wanted to write something about my year in Scripture School. Something long-winded, detailing some of what I learned throughout the year. I may still do that, but yesterday's quote has given me some healthy perspective. Why did I go to Emmaus Scripture School? Why did I sit in front of the same man for over 200 hours, listening to him talk about the Bible? To gain knowledge? Yes, that's part of it. I like knowing things, and I like being able to encourage and challenge people by what I know...or at least by what others know and what I plagiarize. But why this? Why the Bible? Why Christianity? Do I like the information it provides? Sometimes, sometimes not. Does it give what I might consider generally good advice? I think so.

Still, though these might be okay reasons to devote myself to the study of Scripture for a year (and perhaps longer), the thing that makes any of it meaningful is the resurrection. to paraphrase yesterday's quote, if there is no resurrection then who really cares about what is in the Bible? It's of absolutely no consequence, and you're probably better off ignoring it since large portions of it are complete lies. However, if there is a resurrection -- and the very fact that I'm talking about it 2,000 years later stands as at least some kind of proof that there just might be -- then what the Bible says matters. Who Jesus was and is matters. In fact it matters more than anything else. Is it a step of faith to give your life to this pursuit? It is, but is also a step of faith to ignore the claim of the resurrection.

N.T. Wright says, "The message of the resurrection is that this world matters!" Scripture School has been a chance for me to hear and learn about what matters, and this is so because all of what I learned is based on the claim that Jesus died and rose again on the third day. As I dying human being, that sounds like news worth pursuing.

The Hinge

I'm almost done with reading The Reason for God by Timothy Keller. It's a interesting survey of the objections and defenses of the Christian faith, and certainly worth a read if you're into that sort of thing. However, there is one passage in the chapter entitled 'The Reality of the Resurrection' which both sums up the book, and sums up the Christian faith. It is the hinge on which everything turns. Everything.

'If Jesus rose from the dead, then you have to accept all that He said; if He didn't rise from the dead, then why worry about any of what He said? The issue on which everything hangs is not whether you like His teaching but whether or not He rose from the dead.'

Perhaps Maths Is Useful Afterall

I just got two pretty massive books in the post today. God's Empowering Presence by Gordon Fee and Doug Moo's commentary on the The Epistle to the Romans. It seems rather strange that a commentary on one of the sixty-six books in the Bible could be lengthier than the Bible itself, but such is the nature of the Book of Romans that it actually merits such verbose treatment. Fee's book is quite unique, in that he carries out an exegesis on every part of Paul's letters which deals with the Holy Spirit. It seems like a book aimed mostly at scholars and students, which means some of it is likely to go over my head. I mean he doesn't even write Greek words using the English alphabet! What's up with that? Instead he uses the Greek alphabet, so I'm left trying to use my (limited) mathematics knowledge in order to work out what word Fee is referring to. I can pick out most of the letters, but there are still some I'm not so sure on. It does give me a certain sense of accomplishment when I work out one of the words though, so it's not all bad. In fact, why not join me in my quest for self-satisfaction by working out the English spelling of this word: χάρισμα

See, it's fun, isn't it? (As a clue, one of the Greek letters in this word is the equivalent of two English letters)